RHINOLOGY

Soluţii chirurgicale de rezervă în dacriocistita cronică recidivantă

 Backup surgical solutions in recurrent chronic dacryocystitis

First published: 26 noiembrie 2020

Editorial Group: MEDICHUB MEDIA

DOI: 10.26416/ORL.49.4.2020.3970

Abstract

Introduction. The functional purpose of the lacrimal ex­cre­tory system is to drain tears from the eyes into the na­sal cavity. The stagnation of tears in the lacrimal sac in the conditions of a stenotic drainage system leads to the ap­pearance of acute and chronic dacryocystitis. Chronic da­cryo­cystitis, with frequent episodes of exacerbation, is ex­tremely torturous for the patient and, after 1-2 years of evolution, it requires a definitive radical solution. Thus, oph­thal­mo­logists and ENT surgeons must find solutions for patients with multiple interventional procedures in the lacrimal nasal passages. Materials and method. We conducted a retrospective clinical study on 27 pa­tients (29 eyes) hospitalized in the ENT Department of the Bucharest University Emergency Hospital between 2014 and 2018. The inclusion criteria were: chronic da­cryo­cystitis with nasolacrimal stenosis, with at least one failed conservative therapeutic procedure. The exclusion criteria were: presacal stenosis of the tear ducts, patients without conservative therapeutic procedures (stent/en­do­sco­pic dacryocystorhinostomy – DCRS). The clinical pro­to­col consisted of ophthalmological examination, ENT examination, contrastography, nasal endoscopy, cranio­cerebral CT, and surgery in a mixed ophthalmologist-ENT team. Post-therapeutic monitoring was performed at 1, 2 and 6 months. Results. The therapeutic procedures consisted of stents under nasal endoscopic control in 38% of cases, external DCRS in 21% of cases, and dacryocystectomy in 41% of cases. In stented cases (11 cases) there were two failures (which were resolved one by DCRS, and the other by dacryocystectomy). In cases where external DCRS was performed (6 cases), we had no failure, and in cases with dacryocystectomy, there was one case with failure that required two reinterventions. Conclusions. External DCRS may be a therapeutic option for patients with sacal and postsacal lacrimal stenosis who have a history of curative procedure. Dacryocystectomy is the backup sur­ge­ry for recurrent chronic dacryocystitis. We consider that this intervention has minor consequences on the pa­tient’s quality of life and should be taken into account when compared to iterative conservative interventions.
 

Keywords
stenosis, nasolacrimal duct, external approach

Rezumat

Introducere. Scopul funcţional al sistemului excretor la­­cri­­mal este de a drena lacrimile dinspre ochi înspre ca­vi­ta­tea nazală. Stagnarea lacrimilor în sacul lacrimal, în con­di­ţiile unui sistem de drenaj stenozat, duce la apariţia da­crio­cistitei acute şi cronice. Dacriocistita cronică, cu epi­soa­­de frecvente de acutizare, este extrem de chinuitoare pentru pacient, care, după 1-2 ani de evoluţie, solicită o soluţie radicală de­fi­ni­ti­vă. Asfel, chirurgii oftalmologi şi ORL trebuie să găsească so­lu­ţii pentru pacienţii cu mul­ti­ple proceduri intervenţionale la nivelul căilor la­cri­mo­nazale. Materiale şi metodă. Am realizat un stu­diu clinic retrospectiv la 27 de pacienţi (29 de ochi) in­­ter­­naţi în Compartimentul ORL al Spitalului Universitar de Urgenţă Bucureşti în perioada 2014-2018. Cri­te­rii­le de includere au fost: dacriocistită cronică cu stenoză de ca­nal nazolacrimal cu cel puţin o procedură terapeutică con­ser­va­toare eşuată. Criteriile de excludere au fost: ste­no­ză presacală a căilor lacrimale, pacienţi fără proceduri te­­ra­peu­tice conservatoare (stentare/dacriocistorinostomie endoscopică – DCRS). Protocolul clinic a constat în examen oftalmologic, examen ORL, contrastografie, endoscopie na­za­lă, CT craniocerebral, intervenţie chirurgicală în echipă mix­tă oftalmolog-ORL. Monitorizarea postterapeutică s-a fă­­cut la 1, 2 şi 6 luni. Rezultate. Procedurile terapeutice au con­stat în: stentări sub control endoscopic nazal la 38% din ca­zuri, DCRS pe cale externă în 21% din cazuri şi da­crio­cis­tec­to­mie la 41% din cazuri. În cazurile stentate (11) au fost do­uă eşecuri (care s-au rezolvat unul prin DCRS, celălalt prin dacriocistectomie). În cazurile la care s-a practicat DCRS externă (6), nu am avut niciun eşec, iar în cazurile cu da­­crio­­cis­tec­to­mie, s-a înregistrat eşec într-un caz, la care au fost necesare două reintervenţii. Concluzii. DCRS pe cale exter­nă poate reprezenta o variantă terapeutică pentru pa­cienţii cu stenoză de căi lacrimale sacală şi postsacală care au avut o procedură cu viză curativă în antecedente. Dacriocistectomia este intervenţia chirurgicală de rezervă pentru dacriocistitele cronice recidivante. Considerăm că această intervenţie are consecinţe minore asupra calităţii vieţii pacientului şi că este de luat în calcul în comparaţie cu intervenţiile conservatoare iterative.
 

Introduction

The tears produced at the level of the lacrimal gland flow from the eyes to the nose through the upper and lower lacrimal points, through the lacrimal canal, through the common canal, and through the lacrimal nasal duct(1). Naturally, the nasal mucosa and the conjunctival mucosa are colonized with bacteria. This causes the lacrimal excretory system to be exposed to infection and inflammation. The functional purpose of the lacrimal excretory system is to drain tears from the eyes into the nasal cavity(2). The stagnation of tears in the lacrimal sac under the conditions of a stenotic drainage system leads to the appearance of acute and chronic dacryocystitis(3).

Chronic dacryocystitis, with frequent episodes of exacerbation, is extremely torturous for the patient, and, after 1-2 years of evolution, it requires a definitive radical solution (Figure 1). Thus, ophthalmologists and ENT surgeons must find solutions for patients with multiple interventional procedures in the nasolacrimal passages(4).

The therapeutic principles in nasolacrimal canal (NLC) stenosis are instrumental dilation, NLC stenting, endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCRS), external DCRS, and dacryocystectomy(5). The approaches are ophthalmic, ENT, and mixed. Before a therapeutic decision, it is essential to investigate using imaging by contrastography, which can objectify the obstruction of drainage through the nasolacrimal canal and the retention of the contrast substance in the tear sac(6) (Figure 2). Craniocerebral CT/orbit investigation provides additional data on nasal pathology and can be extremely useful before a radical surgical solution such as dacryocystectomy(7) (Figure 3).

Materials and method

We conducted a retrospective clinical study on 27 patients (29 eyes) hospitalized in the ENT Department of the Bucharest University Emergency Hospital between 2014 and 2018. The inclusion criteria were: chronic dacryocystitis (DC) with NLC stenosis with at least one failed conservative therapeutic procedure. The exclusion criteria were: presacal stenosis of the tear ducts, patients without conservative therapeutic procedures (stent/endoscopic DCRS). The clinical protocol consisted of ophthalmological examination, ENT examination, contrastography, nasal endoscopy, craniocerebral CT, and surgery in a mixed ophthalmologist-ENT team. The post-therapeutic monitoring was performed at 1, 2 and 6 months.
 

Figure 1. Acute right suppurative dacryocystitis after craniofacial trauma – clinical appearance
Figure 1. Acute right suppurative dacryocystitis after craniofacial trauma – clinical appearance
Figure 2. Contrastography indicating a dilated left tear sac with contrast retention
Figure 2. Contrastography indicating a dilated left tear sac with contrast retention
Figure 3. Craniocerebral CT scan indicating dilated right lacrimal sac (corresponding to clinical dacryocystocele)
Figure 3. Craniocerebral CT scan indicating dilated right lacrimal sac (corresponding to clinical dacryocystocele)

Results

Male patients accounted for 67% (18:9) of cases. Most patients were in the age group 41-60 years old (44%). The clinical picture was represented by epiphora (all 29 eyes) and dacryocystocele (18 eyes). Most patients (21) had more than one episode of acute suppurative DC. All patients had at least one instrumental permeabilization procedure of NLC (Figure 4). Craniocerebral CT abnormalities were present in 93% of cases. Nasal endoscopic abnormalities were present in 85.18% of cases (Figure 5). The therapeutic procedures consisted of stents under nasal endoscopic control in 38% of cases, external DCRS in 21% of cases, and dacryocystectomy in 41% of cases. Post-therapeutic monitoring was performed by ophthalmological consultation, ENT consultation and nasal endoscopy, being represented in Figure 4. In the stented cases (11), there were two failures (which were solved one by DCRS, the other by dacryocystectomy). In the cases where external DCRS was performed (6), we did not have any failure, and in cases where we performed dacryocystectomy there was registered failure in one case, in which two reinterventions were necessary. The factors correlated with therapeutic failure were the number of episodes of suppurative acute DC in the antecedents and the number of previous instrumental maneuvers.

Discussion

DCRS has as indications the sacal and postsacal obstruction of NLC, and endoscopic DCRS is the surgical variant to be chosen as the first intention, being a procedure approached by the ENT surgeon. The principle consists in draining the lacrimal sac directly into the nasal cavity by the endonasal route, the nasolacrimal canal being obstructed. The main disadvantage is the stenosis(8). External DCRS is an alternative to the endoscopic variant, with advantages and disadvantages(9). It is a procedure approached by the ophthalmologist surgeon or in the ophthalmologist-ENT team. The principle consists in the external creation of a large lacrimal neostoma with wide osteotomy and directed epithelization by creating flaps from lacrimal sac (LS) and nasal mucoperiosteum sutured at the level of the lacrimal fossa(10). The indication consists in the failure of a conservative procedure with a curative visa of endoscopic DCRS type or stenting of nasolacrimal routes. The justification for the external approach could be to avoid the changes produced by a previous intervention at the level of the mucosa of the nasolacrimal pathways(11,12).

Dacryocystectomy consists in the complete surgical ablation of the lacrimal sac. It was first described by Woodhouse in 1724 and was the surgical standard before the improvement of DCRS in the management of dacryocystitis and lacrimal fistulas. It is the method of choise when we suspect a sacral tumor or lithiasis of the lacrimal sac, and its indications in cases of dacryocystitis are marked epiphora and very dilated/altered lacrimal sac(13) (Figure 6). As for disadvantages, dacryocystectomy is laborious; there is a risk of residual tear sac with recurrence of the pathology, risk of damage to the medial cantonal tendon, visible scar, permanent epiphora, and it requires general anesthesia(14). In our experience, the disadvantages are not so marked. With a careful surgical technique, the scar is very discreet, and the epiphora is not so marked, especially in the elderly, probably associated with atrophy of the lacrimal gland (Figure 7). The major advantage is that it is a radical procedure, which completely solves the pathology.
 

Figure 4. Therapeutic history of lacrimonasal pathways
Figure 4. Therapeutic history of lacrimonasal pathways
Figure 5. Types of CT/endoscopic abnormalities in the studied cases
Figure 5. Types of CT/endoscopic abnormalities in the studied cases

Conclusions

External DCRS may be a therapeutic option for patients with sacral and postsacal tear stenosis who have a history of curative procedure. This intervention can be adopted in the extension of ENT surgery and performed in a mixed team, ENT surgeon – ophthalmologist. General anesthesia provides comfort to the patient and the surgeon. Dacryocystectomy is the backup surgery for recurrent chronic dacryocystitis. We consider that this intervention has minor consequences on the patient’s quality of life and should be taken into account when compared to iterative conservative interventions, disappointing for the patient, but also for the surgeon. Undoubtedly, in this chronic pathology of the tear ducts, a mixed team (ENT surgeon, ophthalmologist, and the patient) is required in order to obtain the best therapeutic result.  
 

Figure 6. Left dacryocystectomy – intraoperative aspects
Figure 6. Left dacryocystectomy – intraoperative aspects
Figure 7. Left dacryocystectomy – postoperative appearance
Figure 7. Left dacryocystectomy – postoperative appearance

Conflicts of interests: The authors declare no con­flict of interests.

Bibliografie

  1. Clemente CD, editor. Gray’s anatomy of the human body (30th Ed.). Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1985.

  2. Jorge GC, Alfonso UB. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction. eMedicine. 2001;7:1.

  3. Shermetaro C, Gladstone GJ. Adult nasolacrimal duct obstruction. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1994 Mar;94(3):229-32. 

  4. Bharangar S, Singh N, Lal V. Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy: Best Surgical Management for DCR. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Dec;64(4):366-9.

  5. Singh S, Ali MJ. Congenital Dacryocystocele: A Major Review. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jul/Aug;35(4):309-317. 

  6. Taylor RS, Ashurst JV. Dacryocystitis. [Updated 2020 Jun 26]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan.

  7. McGrath LA, Satchi K, McNab AA. Recognition and Management of Acute Dacryocystic Retention. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jul/Aug;34(4):333-335. 

  8. Peter DJ. Techniques in endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy. Essentials in Opthalmology, Part 3. 2006;71–82. doi: 10.1007/3-540-29969-6-6.

  9. Poublon RML, Hertoge Kde R. Endoscopic-assisted reconstructive surgery of the lacrimal duct. Clin Plast Surg. 2009 Jul;36(3):399-405.

  10. McNab A. Manual of Orbital and Lacrimal surgery. 2nd Ed. Oxford: Butterworth-Hienemann; 1998. Dacryocystorhinostomy.

  11. Ali MJ, Naik MN, Honavar SG. External dacryocystorhinostomy: Tips and tricks. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;5(3):191-5.

  12. Cokkeser Y, Evereklioglu C, Er H. Comparitive external versus endonasal dacryocystorhinosotmy: results in 115 patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;123:488–91.

  13. Ali MJ. Dacryocystectomy: goals, indications, techniques and complications. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;30(6):512-6.

  14. Matayoshi S, Van Baak A, Cozac A, Sardinha M, Fernandes JB, da Mota Moura E. Dacryocystectomy: indications and results. Orbit. 2004 Sep;23(3):169-73.